Thursday, November 11, 2010

Kid Auto Races at Venice, Cal.


Introducing the Little Tramp


Kid Auto Races at Venice, Cal. by Henry Lehrman, 1914:



Chaplin's second onscreen starring role, and the first appearance of the Little Tramp / Kid Auto Races at Venice, Cal. is based on the premise that this character can control the frame completely — an auspicious bow / Already lighting the match with a kick off his shoe-sole / It was Chaplin, before Hitchcock, who first "controlled the universe" / The Tramp, this drunk, doesn't give a shit / This drunk's a narcissist / Because tramps are real people too / Bukowski could have written this picture / Charlie / The thinking-man's Democrat

Kid Auto Races at Venice, Cal. by Henry Lehrman, 1914:








===

Making a Living


Introducing Charles Chaplin


Making a Living by Henry Lehrman, 1914:



Chaplin's vaudeville bandito moustache / A "sharper" in top-hat and monocle and spats beneath the Edendale sun / A monocle like the makeup around the eye of Petey the dog in Our Gang / And what if Dave Eggers had brio / That bit where the sharper turns his head back around and you see the monocle's fallen out of his eye, it doesn't look like a mistake so it's the most minor gag ever and one of the most pleasurable to see, I couldn't tell you why / Twitchy and frantic but the kid's got it / Every comedy till 1918 was surrealist / Back when drunk aristocrats discovered autos / Stabbing's just a blow, you stab or get stabbed you just keep on keeping on in the antic frenetic frame / Visual chaos / Don't ask sense of Making a Living / A real race to GET OUT THE NEWS / Henry Lerhman HAS AT IT / And for bystanders on the street it must have looked like some wildman getting possessed by one of those jumping Méliès devils

Making a Living by Henry Lehrman, 1914:






===

Dé-si-ré!


The Will to 'Desired'


Dé-si-ré! by Sacha Guitry, 1937:



Madame to her boyfriend monsieur le ministre, while getting ready for bed: "To think one day you could be president of the Republic." "Why do you say that?" "Whenever I see you in your underwear, I can't help thinking about it." / One wants to quote every line from a Guitry film, and of course this 'theatrical' chamber comedy about domestics and their employers lends itself to that desire / A film naturally built on cross-cut scenes, in line with the great French tradition of framing a story of masters and servants not merely as an examination of the struggle between disproportionate power and ill-matched members of respective classes but more interestingly as a battle between the sexes / "Songes et mensonges!" / "You don't send a deaf woman to dinner alone!" / Violence in Dé-si-ré! is the angular suddenness and rapidity of the cross-cuts, shots only held long enough to contain un éclatement of sound / Désiré, feminine forename of Guitry's character (the valet who has seduced, seduces, inadvertently), with the masculine ending, character and name at one with the slippage back and forth between open and repressed longing which even itself is worn on the sleeve, and bringing to mind Guitry's phrase recounted by Luc Moullet in our discussion on JLG's Une femme mariée: "I'm against women — I'm right up against them" / The valet Désiré desired by Madame Odette (played by Jacqueline Delubac, ice-coy) / Delubac lived till 90 and died in the same year as Gummo / Guitry's magnificent hand-flapping chest-pounding soliloquies, especially that one at the end where the sculptural moonlight provides the spotlight, as though Désiré's mounted a stage for all to see and hear his most private confession, transformed, frieze-like, classical, into the stationary, though animated, voice — his posture assuming the same arch, the near-leer, it took in Madame's erotic dream... / As the movie says: "You'd think one only heard properly through closed doors."

Dé-si-ré! by Sacha Guitry, 1937:







===

Wednesday, November 03, 2010

Where Have the Dreams of Youth All Gone?


Tough Love Is Radical Protocol


Seishun no yume ima idzuko [Where Have the Dreams of Youth All Gone?] by Yasujirô Ozu, 1932:



If there were no image track, 90 minutes of black leader, and only this title, it would certainly be a classic, a film to show your children the eve of their departure out of state for art-school / Where Have the Dreams of Youth All Gone? [Seishun no yume ima idzuko] comes the same year as A Picture-Book for Grown-Ups: I Was Born, But... and a handful of other features — if it's not quite as even as that movie or the great Tokyo Chorus it is perhaps due to the nucleic arrangement of leads (who nevertheless include Ureo Egawa, Tatsuo Saitô, Chishû Ryû) and a Kôgo Noda scenario that doesn't start to coalesce until the final third, but better late than never / Ozu hasn't yet progressed into constructing an infinite psychology of his women / His subject is Japanese boy-school rumph-rumph camaraderie again (in preparation for the final ten or fifteen years of his cinema which in part or as a whole can be titled Where Have the Dreams of Youth All Gone?, but this is obvious), the graduation-comedy boys'-romance / Nevertheless, there are women, and there is handiwork / There's biting off the thread of the mending / And in Where Have the Dreams of Youth All Gone? there is a custodian with the same force to motivate the action as the faculty, the universe would explode if this happened in the modern age of movies, Freddy Krueger notwithstanding / Ozu with Renoir has shown it all — removing lint from a navel, etc. / Of course waterbags and death's door are as common as the common cold in early Ozu / A leap — suddenly Tetsuo (Egawa) takes over his father's position at the family firm, i.e., the school, from student to headmaster, a fantasy / Blink your eyes and it happens / Smocks for the women at the office / "A year later, the new president still looks like a student" (unlike Zuckerberg he reads Vanity Fair and smokes) / It's not as easy to spend money, to be rich, in 1932, you have to have cash or write checks / "I... am Tetsuo." / Two grown-up school chums moving heads in synch like the young siblings in the previous films / Million Dollar Legs by W. C. Fields and Eddie Cline / Overt melodrama of early Ozu / Fireworks going off as usual express passion but the hand on the windowpane is a new modulation / "The boss and the secretary — it's banal." / The climax in which the entire scene plays out in the gloom of a matted lens, stormclouds around the shocking, important explosion which blows aside the relative banalities of the preceding reels in the film / From this point to the end where, in the final scene, the lens opens wide and the matte disappears, the film achieving a great poetry in image and montage — the waving pair of trees (bringing to mind the macaws in the first image of Film Socialisme) — then two, and two, and two — Saiki and Oshige on the train, waving — the three copains waving back from the rooftop of work at the train as it passes, their arms lowering, slowly, uncertainly — in perfect synchronicity...

Seishun no yume ima idzuko [Where Have the Dreams of Youth All Gone?] by Yasujirô Ozu, 1932:












===

King Kong


He Crumbled Out of Shame


King Kong by Merian C. Cooper and Ernest B. Schoedsack, 1933:



In the 1970s Serge Gainsbourg said: "You see these films now where the color just shits all over the place. But King Kong, it's like a beautiful dream..." / Overture title card, the modernist nitrate-optimized draft-plan aesthetic of the Modern Now in Fritz Lang's Metropolis / The best of the "trilogy" — although Schoedsack's Mighty Joe Young comes close, actually maybe it's better, I don't know / Lewton (The Ghost Ship) and Hawks (Barbary Coast, To Have and Have Not, The Thing from Another World) / "Driscoll, first mate" is the semblable of my dead grandfather in the same year / Get a girl for your picture, go out and make the greatest movie in the world / A Bowery mission / In 1933 even a fantasy movie is conscious of the poor / Apocalypse Now is as much King Kong as Conrad / "I don't know, — but I do." / Recognizing the commercial necessity of the female lead money-role, that's the adventure film — money is adventure / Cooper knew the B-picture and A-picture could merge (see Laemmle) / Constructing the prayer plinth for a new, radical cinema of attraction / In King Kong the White is the Other ("Scream, bitch.") / — The scream of reciprocation, a go at avenging all history through a depiction: this is the special effect / The "special effect" in the frame you can't take your eyes off of / Can't take your eyes off him / Can't turn your stare away / He: "I lost my baby." — She: "I could tell he wanted me." / If a wasp shot me with six stingers I don't think I'd topple / Meticulous effects don't want your engagement / Editing dictated by how long something "looks real" in the shot — all editing participates in this assessment to some extent / Cooper doesn't care what else registers in the shot — it's all about "where-you're-supposed-to-look" / The music doesn't want you to know what's actually happening / It would be twice the movie without the score / Fay Wray's scream is a projectile vomit / Everything in the '30s comes back to airplanes and daredevilry / These movies all star people who live in California / Something closer to reality, the artifice, and the folly of cinema, the technicians, labor, long hours, families waiting for Dad to get home late after another long night, towering ambition, stability sought through craft, there on the tower, anthropomorphic, ontological confusion, a doll, a nothing — / Or: graceful as Chaplin — no exits that don't take some measure of courage / Make your bed and lie in it / It is what it is / "It was beauty, killed the beast."

King Kong by Merian C. Cooper and Ernest B. Schoedsack, 1933:








===

Tuesday, November 02, 2010

The Pearls of the Crown


Paid for by American Cinema Lovers for Sacha Guitry and the Advancement of Orson Welles


Les Perles de la couronne [The Pearls of the Crown] by Sacha Guitry, 1937:



Vertical poetry / Ultimate découpage / Bergman + Ferrara / The Merchant of Venice / Greatest fight montage (rebuke to nattering buffs who believe there's AN "ontology" to everything, especially "fight scenes": i.e., "demarcation of combatants" + "clear spatial bearing"), the predecessor of Blast of Silence / Question posed: How many monarchs realize deference is a sham? / Early Chabrol / "As a reward you may lick my fingertips." / Defiant cinema in '37 France: reversal — black servant boy: "You may lick my fingertips." / "Did you see Madame du Barry guillotined?" "No, unfortunately — I was away from Paris." "She was beautiful — what a head! It was as if they cut off the body, not the head!" / Tableaux vivants, all history as far back as the Hellenic comes to roost in The Pearls of the Crown — Guitry uncontainable (theater, cinema) — ultimate découpage: containment uncontained and contained uncontainment / A film of perfect, non-matching, exquisitely artisanal books, chapters, subheads and footnotes / Rivette / Lubitsch / von Sternberg / The lyric soprano of "notes de coquette": a doll crooning for the pearl / "Yes, my sweet Negress, your profile isn't Greek. No, no, Helen's beauty isn't what I seek. But your beauty makes my head spin. For the satin luster of your ebony skin will bring this pearl's whiteness to its peak." (I usually despise attempts to make subtitles match rhymes, but whoever tackled those particular couplets employed reason in their crime) / "I'll curse all women until the day I finally meet one who makes me forget the harm the rest have done me." "Inexorably." "What's with all the adverbs on this ship?" / Aquatic cinematography (in the Bresson sense) of the '30s (cf. Rossellini's first films) / And maybe the American electorate deserves what it's about to get / And "Guitry was a prince" / The benevolent civil monarchs and patrons, passed, / Leopards, extinct, / Bequeathed us pearls / Masterpieces like this

Les Perles de la couronne [The Pearls of the Crown] by Sacha Guitry, 1937:










===

Saturday, October 23, 2010

A Picture-Book for Grown-Ups: I Was Born, But...


This Film Is Not Really a Premake of Ozu's Great Good Morning Which If It Had the Following Subtitle It Would Be Apt: Soda Pressing


1. The moving truck en route to the family's new home gets stuck in the mud, tire futilely spinning. In Japan, not the wheel of Fortune: in Ozu, no arrival —

rather, the rearrival of all things.

A circle: a smile attached to a frown.

O-zu.

Ootona no miru e-hon: Umarete wa mita keredo [A Picture-Book for Grown-Ups: I Was Born, But...] by Yasujirô Ozu, 1932:




2. Thus the Pair, the Reflection, in A Picture-Book for Grown-Ups: I Was Born, But... [Ootona no miru e-hon: Umarete wa mita keredo, 1932], with its ambivalent, ambiguous title. The Child and Adult united: I was born, but... — but what? If being born must be qualified, the conclusion must read that I am not exactly alive... not exactly a 'me'... the implicit, invisible "I-myself" in "umarete"... I was born, but I'm not exactly an I, a me...

What, then? — A nothing, and an all-things, at once.

Or — I was born, but not like you were — I'm an alien, I'm an Other, I'm Momotarô.

Ootona no miru e-hon: Umarete wa mita keredo [A Picture-Book for Grown-Ups: I Was Born, But...] by Yasujirô Ozu, 1932:




-The boss's son who joins in on picking on the sons of the employee Yoshii (played by the silent stork, Tatsuo Saitô) who has just moved his family, in a looks-pathetic display of loyalty, to be closer to his boss.

Ootona no miru e-hon: Umarete wa mita keredo [A Picture-Book for Grown-Ups: I Was Born, But...] by Yasujirô Ozu, 1932:






-The identically-outfitted brothers: Ryôichi (played by Hideo Sugawara of Ozu's Tokyo Chorus from the previous year) and Keiji (played by the "tokkan kozô / straightforward brat" Tomio Aoki of Ozu's film of the same name from three years earlier).

Ootona no miru e-hon: Umarete wa mita keredo [A Picture-Book for Grown-Ups: I Was Born, But...] by Yasujirô Ozu, 1932:



-Strata of power among youth and employer/employee alike.

Ootona no miru e-hon: Umarete wa mita keredo [A Picture-Book for Grown-Ups: I Was Born, But...] by Yasujirô Ozu, 1932:




3. The seldom remarked-upon recurrence of the 'uncanny' in Ozu makes its present felt with full force in I Was Born, But....

-The brothers' "miraculous" waza which, performed at will, paralyzes the bully who drops prone to the earth. The waza ends in Christian crossing. Third gesture resurrects the victim. Changes back and forth again inside the youngsters' clique throughout the film: from bully to bewitched, from bullied to sorcerer.

Ootona no miru e-hon: Umarete wa mita keredo [A Picture-Book for Grown-Ups: I Was Born, But...] by Yasujirô Ozu, 1932:







-If you eat sparrow eggs you'll gain in vigor.

Ootona no miru e-hon: Umarete wa mita keredo [A Picture-Book for Grown-Ups: I Was Born, But...] by Yasujirô Ozu, 1932:



-Struck poses / aura-shock.

Ootona no miru e-hon: Umarete wa mita keredo [A Picture-Book for Grown-Ups: I Was Born, But...] by Yasujirô Ozu, 1932:



-The inexplicable.

Ootona no miru e-hon: Umarete wa mita keredo [A Picture-Book for Grown-Ups: I Was Born, But...] by Yasujirô Ozu, 1932:



4. The greatest scene: the home movies played back at the home of the boss (played by Ozu regular Takeshi Sakamoto; projectionist: Ozu's favorite lead, Chishû Ryû, in an early appearance). The cuts from the father's silly antics revealed in the footage to the reverse-shots of the shock of the sons encountering this playful, youthful side of their father for the first time — they're thrown into confusion — and they don't know whether their father's colleagues are laughing with him or at him. The editing across this scene is an example par excellence of the shot-reverse-shot technique which as a core cinematographic axiom has been effectively abandoned by contemporary filmmakers. One moment in particular astounds: (A) Shot of the footage projected onto the living room screen, a close-up of the father pulling a face. (B) Yoshii's/Saitô's eyes roll up, and look directly into the camera. (C) Cut to "reverse-angle" of the two boys, all astonished expressions at what they're seeing. Yoshii's/Saitô's at-camera gaze transforms this two-shot succession from a simple angle/angle communiqué into an eyeline match, the looker and the looked-upon: as such, a message from the father to the sons, telling them something he perhaps never could in physical life. (D) The boys' gazes shift toward the area in the living room where their father is sitting: the 'truth' of the accepted him in physical reality. (E) Cut to an angle/boys'-POV of the father, jovial, laughing: a real-world manifestation of this persona only first glimpsed by the boys moments before on the screen — at the same time, a man, a father, who might be doffing too low the proverbial cap...

He was born, but that was so far back...

Ootona no miru e-hon: Umarete wa mita keredo [A Picture-Book for Grown-Ups: I Was Born, But...] by Yasujirô Ozu, 1932:







5. Speaking of cuts-on-look: the physical, bodily component (a turn, a thrust of the torso, sometimes repeated in metronomic succession, robo-servo-synchronized) that always induces the cut to the reverse-shot in Ozu.

In Ozu, in other words, the cut-on-look is a cut-on-action.

Ootona no miru e-hon: Umarete wa mita keredo [A Picture-Book for Grown-Ups: I Was Born, But...] by Yasujirô Ozu, 1932:







===