Monday, March 07, 2011

Black Narcissus


"Beautiful Cinematography," or: It Takes Life-Problems to Make an Actual Image


Black Narcissus by Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger, 1947:



Sunday afternoon film / Ghastly-kitsch / All that shit in old anglophone films where a child says something-whatever and the movie cuts to a reverse-shot of an adult wide-eyed putting forth words in response to the patronizing effect of "Oh, is that so?" before a quick cut out / There are a load of dead spans in this film — I wish I saw it as replete as other viewers claim to have done, and yet moments still interest me / For instance: Kerr is erotic before Clodagh's erotic / :a menstruating Sound of Music / :the wind that incessantly whips, blows in the pathogens / :Sister Ruth's glee in ringing a church bell hung over an abyss / :"No, I don't want to go away — I want to stay here like this for the rest of my life." / Beyond that, other moments demand some remark... / 'Beauty''s face smeared with inedible chemicals / "Sister, may I congratulate you on the birth of Christ?" / Glorious Christmas scene, the holiday as the calm offering / Sweat droplets on Sister Ruth's fevered brow like the eyes of a spider / Insufferable cloying delivery of "Lemini" 119 times / Twice-seen, Black Narcissus strikes me as a camp, technically complicated, gorgeous, morally offensive, admirably garish and ultimately shallow Crappy Film by two photoplaywrights I like quite a bit / No, they're cinĂ©astes in other works, but to compare Black Narcissus to another adaptation of Rumer Godden, one goes back to the language of notices

Black Narcissus by Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger, 1947:




The frames from the film (not 'production-stills') placed above are stolen from various sites around the Internet, as no means of capturing stills from a Blu-ray presently exist on the Mac platform.

===


Previous pieces on Michael Powell (solo), and Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger, at Cinemasparagus:

Red Ensign [1934]

The Phantom Light [1935]


===

2 comments:

  1. 'menstruating.' Perfect adjective for the film.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The film isn't as morally offensive as it seems at face value. I studied it for A-level Film Studies and it can be read as critical of British imperialism in India, the nunnery obviously representing the British, and the constant problems that occur there representing the unwelcomness of their presence in India.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.